Planning

From CFIR Wiki

Jump to: navigation, search


Planning
Taxonomy
Domain
Process
Siblings
Engaging
Executing
Planning
Reflecting & Evaluating
Measurement maturity
Quantitative tools


Contents

Version 1.0

The degree to which a scheme or method of behavior and tasks for implementing an intervention are developed in advance and the quality of those schemes or methods.

Description

The degree to which a scheme or method of behavior and tasks for implementing an intervention are developed in advance and the quality of those schemes or methods. The fundamental objective of planning is to design a course of action to promote effective implementation by building local capacity for using the intervention, collectively and individually[1]. The specific steps in plans will be based on the underlying theories or models used to promote change at organization and individual levels[2]. For example, the Institute for Healthcare Improvement[3][4], Grol et al.[5], and Glisson and Schoenwald[6] all describe comprehensive approaches to implementation on which implementation plans can be developed. However, these theories prescribe different sets of activities because they were developed in different contexts– though commonalities exist as well. Grol et al. list 14 different bodies of theories for changing behaviors in social or organizational contexts[2], and Estabrooks et al. list 18 different models of organizational innovation[7]. Thus, the particular content of plans will vary depending on the theory or model being used to guide implementation. Implementation plans can be evaluated by the degree to which five considerations guide planning: stakeholders' needs and perspectives are considered; strategies are tailored for appropriate subgroups (e.g., delineated by professional, demographic, cultural, organizational attributes); appropriate style, imagery, and metaphors are identified and used for delivering information and education; appropriate communication channels are identified and used; progress toward goals and milestones is tracked using rigorous monitoring and evaluation methods[8][9]; and strategies are used to simplify execution. The latter step may include plans for dry runs (simulations or practice sessions) to allow team members to learn how to use the intervention before going live[10], running trials to allow users to test procedures, gain confidence, and build an environment of psychological safety[10], or taking an incremental approach that breaks the intervention down into manageable parts that can be implemented incrementally[11]. The plan can be formal or informal but should consider all salient contextual factors–both modifiable and non-modifiable. Workarounds can be developed for non-modifiable factors, and strategies can be designed to change factors that can be modified (e.g., increase stakeholders' knowledge of the intervention).

Rationale for inclusion

The degree to which a scheme or method of behavior and tasks for implementing an intervention are developed in advance and quality of those schemes or methods. Planning is one of four fundamental activities in the PSDA (Plan-Do-Study-Act) cycle for implementing change in quality improvement efforts[12]. An assumption underlying implementation models is that they guide planning. This is not always explicitly stated, however. Greenhalgh et al, describe a continuum of conceptual and theoretical bases for spread of innovations in organizations from “let happen,” unpredictable, emergent adoption to “make it happen,” scientific, planned implementation[8]. More research is needed into the role of planning and the nature of quality of planning and its influence on implementation.

Measurement

Qualitative codebook guidelines

Inclusion criteria

Include evidence of pre-implementation diagnostic assessments and planning as well as refinements to the plan.

Note: The example below may also be interpreted as the synthesis and evaluation of evidence to determine the formality of planning and if any planning activities were done.

  • “We held an all-day working meeting where everyone developed a process map and then we tried to figure out what the steps should be to get the new process going.”



Exclusion criteria


Quantitative measures

Attachments

References

  1. Mendel P, Meredith LS, Schoenbaum M, Sherbourne CD, Wells KB: Interventions in organizational and community context: a framework for building evidence on dissemination and implementation in health services research. Adm Policy Ment Health 2008, 35:21-37.
  2. 2.0 2.1 Grol RP, Bosch MC, Hulscher ME, Eccles MP, Wensing M: Planning and studying improvement in patient care: The use of theoretical perspectives. Milbank Q 2007, 85:93-138.
  3. Institute for Healthcare Improvement: The Breakthrough Series: IHI's Collaborative Model for Achieving Breakthrough Improvement. In Book The Breakthrough Series: IHI's Collaborative Model for Achieving Breakthrough Improvement (Editor ed.^eds.) City: Institutue for Healthcare Improvement; 2003:20.
  4. Institute for Healthcare Improvement: Going Lean in Health Care. Book Going Lean in Health Care (Editor ed.^eds.). City 2005.
  5. Grol R, Wensing M, Eccles M: Improving Patient Care: The Implementation of Change in Clinical Practice Edinburgh, Scotland: Elsevier; 2005.
  6. Glisson C, Schoenwald SK: The ARC organizational and community intervention strategy for implementing evidencebased children's mental health treatments. Mental health services research 2005, 7:243-259.
  7. Estabrooks CA, Thompson DS, Lovely JJ, Hofmeyer A: A guide to knowledge translation theory. J Contin Educ Health Prof 2006, 26:25-36.
  8. 8.0 8.1 Greenhalgh T, Robert G, Macfarlane F, Bate P, Kyriakidou O: Diffusion of innovations in service organizations: systematic review and recommendations. Milbank Q 2004, 82:581-629.
  9. Rogers E: Diffusion of Innovations 5th edition. New York, NY: Free Press; 2003.
  10. 10.0 10.1 Edmondson AC, Bohmer RM, Pisana GP: Disrupted routines: Team learning and new technology implementation in hospitals. Adm Sci Q 2001, 46:685-716.
  11. Damanpour F: Organizational Innovation: A Meta-Analysis of Effects of Determinants and Moderators. The Academy of Management Journal 1991, 34:555-590.
  12. Institute for Healthcare Improvement: The Breakthrough Series: IHI's Collaborative Model for Achieving Breakthrough Improvement. In Innvation Series 2003. pp. 20. Cambridge, MA: Institutue for Healthcare Improvement; 2003:20.
Personal tools
Etiquette and Help