You have come to the right place if you are looking for more information about the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) that was originally published in Implementation Science in 2009. This site is created for individuals considering using the CFIR to evaluate an implementation or design an implementation study.
Supported Web Browsers: Google Chrome, Mozilla Firefox, Safari
The CFIR provides a menu of constructs that have been associated with effective implementation. It reflects the state-of-the-science at the time of its development in 2009; including constructs from, for example, Everett Rogers’ Diffusion of Innovations Theory and Greenhalgh and colleagues’ significant compilation of constructs based on their review of 500 published sources across 13 scientific disciplines. In addition to these two sources, the CFIR incorporates 18 other sources. The CFIR considered the spectrum of construct terminology and definitions and compiled them into one organizing framework.
The CFIR provides a menu of constructs arranged across 5 domains that can be used in a range of applications. It can provide a practical guide for systematically assessing potential barriers and facilitators in preparation for implementing an innovation, to providing theory-based constructs for developing context-specific logic models or generalizable middle-range theories. The following Figure shows the 5 Domains; our published Additional File 1 walks through a description of this diagram.
The CFIR was developed by implementation researchers affiliated with Veterans Affairs (VA) Diabetes Quality Enhancement Research Initiative (QUERI). The VA QUERI was launched in 1998 as part of a system-wide transformation aimed at improving the quality of healthcare for Veterans and continues to contribute to this effort by implementing research findings and innovations into routine clinical practice.
By providing a framework of constructs, the CFIR promotes consistent use of constructs, systematic analysis, and organization of findings from implementation studies. The CFIR is easily customized to diverse settings and scenarios. Many users have resonated with it and found it to be a practical tool. Over 300 published articles cite the CFIR and this number is growing by about four new articles per week. Dr. David Atkins , Director of the Veterans Affairs Health Services Research & Development (VA HSR&D) has recognized the need for a framework like the CFIR:
The need for a common, consistently applied set of constructs is recognized and the CFIR has been recommended for use, most notably in a recent publication by Drs. Powell, Proctor and Glass. In their 2014 article, they highlighted the benefits of using the CFIR to increase scientific knowledge about the effectiveness of implementation strategies:
The CFIR has been found to be helpful across a diverse array of scenarios (including low-income contexts). For example, based on Iliot and colleagues’ test of the CFIR as a useful framework for guiding evaluations of complex implementations, they conclude:
It is important to note that these researchers and others have made recommendations to improve or extend the framework. Our team is evaluating these recommendations for inclusion in an updated version of the CFIR.